Shenzhen pet cat high -altitude parabolic smashing the car cat owner's responsibility. The method of paying for the owner of the pet behavior is right or wrong?
5 thoughts on “Shenzhen pet cat high -altitude parabolic smashing the car cat owner's responsibility. The method of paying for the owner of the pet behavior is right or wrong?”
Sandra
Now that people's lives are getting better and better, many families will choose to raise some pets, but because people’s daily work is busy, there are more and more families who choose cats, and cats usually have cats. A commonality is usually curious about everything, and no matter what kind of things, they like to use their own claws to shoot things to the ground, and a pet cat in Shenzhen smashed a car from high altitude parabolic. In the end, this responsibility is borne by the cat owner, and this has also triggered people's discussion. Is the pet owner who paid for the owner of the pet right or wrong? The method of paying for the owner of the pet is right. In fact, for these things, I personally think that the pet owner's order is completely righteous. After all Some behaviors are completely natural, and it is because pets do not follow all kinds of rules like humans and have a moral sense. Therefore, people who raise pets should be responsible for this. pet. . If the pet people do not take care of their pets because of negligence, some of the calamities caused by their pets and some losses caused by others should be borne by pets. Theoretically speaking, it is not the owner to instigate the pet cat's high altitude parabolic to smash the car, but it is also because the owner's negligence did not manage his cat well, which caused such a result. The owners of the bad car are also very innocent. After all, the owner cannot expect that the high -altitude parabolic is actually a cat. But since the cat is raised and not a wild cat, the owner must bear the responsibility of this part, otherwise the part of the owner's loss is really reasonable. The managing your own pet is the sense of responsibility that everyone should have a pet. Although cats and cats cannot go out to bend or destroy the environment, if such pet cats really have parabolic at high altitude, and damage the personal safety and property of others, it is indeed annoying. It is more dangerous than raising dogs. Although some of the pets of pets are not controlled by people at all times, in order to consider the safety of their own pets and to not affect the normal life and personal safety of others, please ask everyone to raise pets. People can manage their own pets. Once your pets have some acts that harm the interests of others, then you should compensate within a reasonable range and take responsibility. But it is best to avoid this situation.
I think the method of paying for the owner of the pet behavior is right. Since the owner of the pet, it should be responsible for the pet's behavior, so that the owner can manage his pet.
Of course, it is right, because pets cannot bear any responsibility, and as the owner, we should pay for the behavior of pets, otherwise what do you do?
right. You are the pets of pets you buy, and you have to restrain the behavior of pets. If you can't even raise any pets, pets are not the same as human thought, so you should make good people when raising pets All precautions to avoid some losses to others' property or personnel.
Now that people's lives are getting better and better, many families will choose to raise some pets, but because people’s daily work is busy, there are more and more families who choose cats, and cats usually have cats. A commonality is usually curious about everything, and no matter what kind of things, they like to use their own claws to shoot things to the ground, and a pet cat in Shenzhen smashed a car from high altitude parabolic. In the end, this responsibility is borne by the cat owner, and this has also triggered people's discussion. Is the pet owner who paid for the owner of the pet right or wrong?
The method of paying for the owner of the pet is right. In fact, for these things, I personally think that the pet owner's order is completely righteous. After all Some behaviors are completely natural, and it is because pets do not follow all kinds of rules like humans and have a moral sense. Therefore, people who raise pets should be responsible for this. pet.
. If the pet people do not take care of their pets because of negligence, some of the calamities caused by their pets and some losses caused by others should be borne by pets.
Theoretically speaking, it is not the owner to instigate the pet cat's high altitude parabolic to smash the car, but it is also because the owner's negligence did not manage his cat well, which caused such a result.
The owners of the bad car are also very innocent. After all, the owner cannot expect that the high -altitude parabolic is actually a cat. But since the cat is raised and not a wild cat, the owner must bear the responsibility of this part, otherwise the part of the owner's loss is really reasonable.
The managing your own pet is the sense of responsibility that everyone should have a pet. Although cats and cats cannot go out to bend or destroy the environment, if such pet cats really have parabolic at high altitude, and damage the personal safety and property of others, it is indeed annoying. It is more dangerous than raising dogs.
Although some of the pets of pets are not controlled by people at all times, in order to consider the safety of their own pets and to not affect the normal life and personal safety of others, please ask everyone to raise pets. People can manage their own pets.
Once your pets have some acts that harm the interests of others, then you should compensate within a reasonable range and take responsibility. But it is best to avoid this situation.
I think the method of paying for the owner of the pet behavior is right. Since the owner of the pet, it should be responsible for the pet's behavior, so that the owner can manage his pet.
Of course, it is right, because pets cannot bear any responsibility, and as the owner, we should pay for the behavior of pets, otherwise what do you do?
This approach is wrong. This is a very bad social atmosphere.
right. You are the pets of pets you buy, and you have to restrain the behavior of pets. If you can't even raise any pets, pets are not the same as human thought, so you should make good people when raising pets All precautions to avoid some losses to others' property or personnel.